Defendant had no standing to challenge a search of his work computer which had a logon banner that stated that it was subject to monitoring. United States v. Woods, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40693 (S.D. Ga. March 24, 2010).*<\/p>\n
A convenience store operator called the police to complaint that someone was \u201cfiddling\u201d with a car too long outside, so a police officer showed up to check. The encounter with the officer was consensual and reasonable suspicion developed. Defendant was driving without a license and he was arrested and the car was validly searched. Grimes v. State, 2010 Ga. App. LEXIS 406 (April 22, 2010).*<\/p>\n
Defendant\u2019s stop for not having a seat belt on was justified by the officer not being able to see the shoulder strap on him. State v. Dansby<\/a>, 2010 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 338 (April 23, 2010).*<\/p>\n Defendant\u2019s argument that the issuing magistrate was not neutral and detached because he had represented the defendant in the past was not preserved for review and not plain error on this record. State v. Miller<\/a>, 2010 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 341 (April 22, 2010).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading