Defendant was handcuffed as a part of his stop for officer safety and to secure the scene. They could also put him in a police car handcuffed. Finally, transporting him to the precinct for a lineup wasn\u2019t an unreasonable seizure requiring probable cause. United States v. Carter, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206777 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 26, 2019).<\/p>\n
This probation search was justified by reasonable suspicion: \u201cThe officers here searched Fleming’s home only after observing him engage in what appeared to be a drug transaction in an area of Los Angeles known for illegal drug activity, recognizing him as someone with a criminal history of drug offenses, and recovering several thousand dollars in bundled cash from his vehicle. These facts satisfy the reasonable suspicion standard.\u201d United States v. Fleming<\/a>, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 35717 (9th Cir. Nov. 29, 2019).*<\/p>\n Defense counsel wasn\u2019t ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress where defendant lacked standing. Waldron v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206695 (D.Utah Nov. 27, 2019).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Defendant was handcuffed as a part of his stop for officer safety and to secure the scene. They could also put him in a police car handcuffed. Finally, transporting him to the precinct for a lineup wasn\u2019t an unreasonable seizure … Continue reading