Defendant\u2019s bank records cannot be equated with CSLI such that a search warrant is required rather than a subpoena. As Carpenter says: “Our decision today is a narrow one. … We do not disturb the application of Smith or Miller or call into question conventional surveillance techniques and tools, such as security cameras. Nor do we address other business records that might incidentally reveal location information.” United States v. Hall, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 195658 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 12, 2019).<\/p>\n
When the police came to defendant\u2019s place to investigate the death of a one-year-old in defendant\u2019s sole care, they developed reasonable suspicion to detain him during the investigation. State v. Batiz<\/a>, 2019 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 721 (Nov. 1, 2019).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Defendant\u2019s bank records cannot be equated with CSLI such that a search warrant is required rather than a subpoena. As Carpenter says: “Our decision today is a narrow one. … We do not disturb the application of Smith or Miller … Continue reading