Omission to tell the USMJ that a trash search of defendant\u2019s house came up empty didn\u2019t undermine the other probable cause, wouldn\u2019t have changed the outcome, and wasn\u2019t a Franks issue. The same here about defendant\u2019s alleged travels: Omissions don\u2019t undermine the probable cause. United States v. Thompson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190259 (D. Idaho Oct. 29, 2019).<\/p>\n
Defendant is charged with \u201c(1) conspiracy to provide material support for acts of terrorism, (2) provision and attempted provision of material support for acts of terrorism, (3) hostage-taking conspiracy, (4) hostage taking, (5) threatening a U.S. national with a weapon of mass destruction, (6) unlawful use of firearms, and (7) firearms conspiracy.\u201d There was probable cause to believe that his email accounts would have pertinent evidence to the investigation, and the motion to suppress them is denied. United States v. Hassan, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190182 (E.D. N.Y. Nov. 1, 2019).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Omission to tell the USMJ that a trash search of defendant\u2019s house came up empty didn\u2019t undermine the other probable cause, wouldn\u2019t have changed the outcome, and wasn\u2019t a Franks issue. The same here about defendant\u2019s alleged travels: Omissions don\u2019t … Continue reading