Defendant\u2019s giving a false name extended the stop and added to the reasonable suspicion to detain him after his true identity was discovered. United States v. Jackson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188225 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 30, 2019).<\/p>\n
The affidavit for the search warrant of defendant\u2019s house had 20 day old information about smelling information and was stale. However, the government gets the benefit of the good faith exception because \u201cthe affidavit provided a \u2018minimally sufficient nexus\u2019 between the illegal activity at issue and 3825 Bonnacreek Drive.\u201d The car, however, not so. Nothing was provided as to it. Denied as to the house; granted as to the car. United States v. Bender, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188218 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 30, 2019).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant\u2019s giving a false name extended the stop and added to the reasonable suspicion to detain him after his true identity was discovered. United States v. Jackson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188225 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 30, 2019). The affidavit for … Continue reading