{"id":4036,"date":"2010-05-18T23:22:32","date_gmt":"2010-04-06T07:00:28","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2010-04-06T07:00:28","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=4036","title":{"rendered":"CA8: Open container violation supports arrest under Fourth Amendment, even if not under state law"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Arrest for an infraction of driving with an open container did not offend the Fourth Amendment, despite state law, applying <a href=\"http:\/\/caselaw.lp.findlaw.com\/scripts\/getcase.pl?court=us&amp;vol=000&amp;invol=06-1082\">Virginia v. Moore<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ca8.uscourts.gov\/opndir\/10\/04\/091380P.pdf\">United States v. Burtton<\/a>, 599 F.3d 823 (8th Cir. 2010):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Here, Burtton&#8217;s violation of the open container law constituted an &#8220;infraction,&#8221; not a misdemeanor. Therefore, the question is whether the commission of an &#8220;infraction&#8221; in the presence of officers supplied the officers with probable cause to arrest Burtton under the Fourth Amendment. &#8220;In a long line of cases, [the Supreme Court has] said that when an officer has probable cause to believe a person committed even a minor crime in his presence, the balancing of private and public interests is not in doubt. The arrest is constitutionally reasonable.&#8221; <a href=\"http:\/\/caselaw.lp.findlaw.com\/scripts\/getcase.pl?court=us&amp;vol=000&amp;invol=06-1082\">Virginia v. Moore<\/a>, 553 U.S. 164, 128 S. Ct. 1598, 1604, 170 L. Ed. 2d 559 (2008) (emphasis added) (citing <a href=\"http:\/\/caselaw.lp.findlaw.com\/scripts\/getcase.pl?court=us&amp;vol=000&amp;invol=99-1408\">Atwater v. City of Lago Vista<\/a>, 532 U.S. 318, 354, 121 S. Ct. 1536, 149 L. Ed. 2d 549 (2001); <a href=\"http:\/\/caselaw.lp.findlaw.com\/scripts\/getcase.pl?court=us&amp;vol=543&amp;invol=146\">Devenpeck v. Alford<\/a>, 543 U.S. 146, 152, 125 S. Ct. 588, 160 L. Ed. 2d 537 (2004); <a href=\"http:\/\/caselaw.lp.findlaw.com\/scripts\/getcase.pl?court=us&amp;vol=420&amp;invol=103\">Gerstein v. Pugh<\/a>, 420 U.S. 103, 111, 95 S. Ct. 854, 43 L. Ed. 2d 54 (1975); <a href=\"http:\/\/caselaw.lp.findlaw.com\/scripts\/getcase.pl?court=us&amp;vol=338&amp;invol=160\">Brinegar v. United States<\/a>, 338 U.S. 160, 164, 69 S. Ct. 1302, 93 L. Ed. 1879 (1949)).<\/p>\n<p>. . .<\/p>\n<p>In light of Moore, &#8220;if an arrest is otherwise reasonable, the fact that it is not for an &#8216;arrestable&#8217; offense does not make it unconstitutional.&#8221; <a href=\"http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=13079410308844273078&amp;q=580+F.3d+633&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=1002\">Thomas v. City of Peoria<\/a>, 580 F.3d 633, 637 (7th Cir. 2009) (citing Moore, 128 S. Ct. at 1606-07). &#8220;[T]he Fourth Amendment does not forbid an arrest for a &#8216;nonjailable&#8217; offense.&#8221; Id. at 638 (rejecting argument of arrestee, who was stopped by a city police officer for a traffic violation and arrested after the officer mistakenly identified him as an individual who had nine unpaid parking tickets and a warrant for his arrest, that the city had an unconstitutional policy of arresting people for not paying their parking tickets).<\/p>\n<p>Applying the rationale of Moore, Bell, and Rose, Burtton unquestionably committed a &#8220;minor crime&#8221;&#8211;violation of an open container law&#8211;in the presence of Officer Maloney when he was holding a 12-ounce plastic cup suspected of containing an alcoholic beverage in close proximity to a liquor bottle on the floor near Burtton. As a result, Officer Maloney had probable cause under the Fourth Amendment to arrest Burtton and conduct a search incident to arrest. See <a href=\"http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=9740570459313111971&amp;q=355+F.3d+1119&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=1002\">United States v. Pratt<\/a>, 355 F.3d 1119, 1121 (8th Cir. 2004) (&#8220;[I]f an officer has arrested the individual, the officer may search the individual&#8217;s person incident to that arrest and may reach into his pockets.&#8221;). Therefore, no redaction of evidence is required from the affidavit tendered in support of the search warrant application, and Burtton&#8217;s Mirandized statement at the police station, admitting that there was marijuana residue at his home, is not the fruit of an illegal search.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=4036\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4036","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4036","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4036"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4036\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4036"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4036"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4036"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}