Substantial compliance with state parole inspection procedures was sufficient for a parole search. Bunting v. State, 907 A.2d 145 (Del. 2006).<\/p>\n
Evidence supported district court’s conclusion that consent was voluntary on totality. Defendant had not been Mirandized, but he was 48 years old and in a legitimate business for himself for about 15 years (although a high school dropout), but under the influence of meth at the time. Everything happened in a public place which indicates a lack of coercion. United States v. Willie, 462 F.3d 892 (8th Cir. September 11, 2006).*<\/p>\n
911 operator overhead male voice say he would “cut your throat” to woman on phone; warrantless entry justified. Lassiter v. City of Bremerton, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64280 (W.D. Wash. September 8, 2006).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading