Defendant\u2019s unsupported claim that the state judge who signed off on his search warrant that led to a federal indictment was under some unspecified investigation doesn\u2019t warrant dismissal of the indictment. United States v. Hamda, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163199 (N.D. Fla. Aug. 20, 2019).<\/p>\n
Police had probable cause to arrest defendant and thus seize his phone. It was searched with a search warrant. The trial court\u2019s conclusory findings are unsupported, and suppression is reversed. People v. Goga, 2019 Mich. App. LEXIS 5741 (Sept. 23, 2019).*<\/p>\n
2255 petitioner fails to show that the search warrant here was obtained by false statements or a \u201cfraud on the court\u201d or that the affidavit or search warrant were defective in anyway. Hendricks v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163436 (C.D. Ill. Sept. 24, 2019).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant\u2019s unsupported claim that the state judge who signed off on his search warrant that led to a federal indictment was under some unspecified investigation doesn\u2019t warrant dismissal of the indictment. United States v. Hamda, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163199 … Continue reading