Officers exceeded the bounds of the traffic stop because they heard defendant\u2019s criminal history and then ordered him out of the car to seek consent to search without any reasonable suspicion. United States v. Coleman, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152832 (D. Nev. Sept. 9, 2019).<\/p>\n
Officers had probable cause for defendant\u2019s arrest on a warrant because he resembled the person sought. His efforts to flee the arrest amounted to a crime, and he wasn\u2019t privileged to ignore the officers and attempt to run them down. Miller v. State<\/a>, 2019 Ga. App. LEXIS 492 (Sept. 9, 2019).*<\/p>\n Defendant\u2019s objection to the R&R\u2019s finding of probable cause wasn\u2019t specific at all, but his own confession and other evidence justified the search warrant for his email account and Facebook to look for evidence of his earlier possession of a firearm. United States v. Bear, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152783 (D. S.D. Sept. 9, 2019).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Officers exceeded the bounds of the traffic stop because they heard defendant\u2019s criminal history and then ordered him out of the car to seek consent to search without any reasonable suspicion. United States v. Coleman, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152832 … Continue reading