Parts of the information were old, but the search warrant was not stale because a critical part of the affidavit showed that there was credible reason to believe drugs would be found there because of the CI\u2019s observation the day before. United States v. Guthrie, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153062 (E.D. Mo. Sept. 9, 2019).*<\/p>\n
The totality of circumstances provided reasonable suspicion to stop defendant\u2019s car. First, the windows were obviously overtinted, which was evident from photographs. Second, there were repeated apparent hand to hand drug sales from a particular house where the same person came out to cars for a minute and then went back inside, and defendant participated in one. United States v. Maclin, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153012 (E.D. Wis. Sept. 9, 2019).*<\/p>\n
Defense counsel wasn\u2019t ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress when there was nothing from the search used in the trial or a \u201cmotion to substantiate,\u201d whatever that is. Crawford v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152956 (M.D. N.C. Sept. 9, 2019).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Parts of the information were old, but the search warrant was not stale because a critical part of the affidavit showed that there was credible reason to believe drugs would be found there because of the CI\u2019s observation the day … Continue reading