{"id":3895,"date":"2010-04-02T06:20:26","date_gmt":"2010-02-26T10:42:11","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2010-02-26T10:42:11","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=3895","title":{"rendered":"MA: &#8220;Fidgeting&#8221; can be furtive movement for RS"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The trial court\u2019s finding of furtive movement supporting reasonable suspicion was not clearly erroneous. <a href=\"http:\/\/weblinks.westlaw.com\/result\/default.aspx?action=Search&amp;cnt=DOC&amp;db=MA-ORSLIP&amp;eq=search&amp;fmqv=c&amp;fn=_top&amp;method=TNC&amp;n=6&amp;origin=Search&amp;query=TO%28ALLAPP+ALLAPPRS%29&amp;rlt=CLID_QRYRLT3819223610262&amp;rltdb=CLID_DB1277013610262&amp;rlti=1&amp;rp=%2Fsearch%2Fdefault.wl&amp;rs=MAOR1.0&amp;service=Search&amp;sp=MassOF-1001&amp;srch=TRUE&amp;ss=CNT&amp;sskey=CLID_SSSA978513610262&amp;sv=Split&amp;vr=1.0\">Commonwealth v. Rivera<\/a>, 76 Mass. App. Ct. 304, 921 N.E.2d 1008 (2010)*:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The defendant quarrels only with the judge&#8217;s determination that his gestures were furtive, asserting that these movements were mere &#8220;fidgeting.&#8221; &#8220;The phrase &#8216;furtive gesture&#8217; appears in many decisions where the issue is whether a patfrisk or a search of a vehicle is justified. The gestures are interpreted by the police (and by the courts) as demonstrating the hiding of contraband or as threatening the officers&#8217; safety.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Defense counsel was not ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress that could never be granted because a private search occurred. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tsc.state.tn.us\/OPINIONS\/tcca\/PDF\/A01\/Paul%20Carr%20Moss%20v%20State.pdf\">Moss v. State<\/a>, 2010 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 166 (February 24, 2010).*<\/p>\n<p>DUI roadblock was constitutionally set up and was properly conducted. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tsc.state.tn.us\/OPINIONS\/tcca\/PDF\/A01\/State%20v%20Elliott%20Aloy.pdf\">State v. Aloyo<\/a>, 2010 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 160 (February 19, 2010).*<\/p>\n<p>Overly broad certified question for suppression appeal precluded appellate review in Tennessee. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tsc.state.tn.us\/OPINIONS\/tcca\/PDF\/A01\/State%20v%20Bradley%20Hawks.pdf\">State v. Hawks<\/a>, 2010 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 157 (February 19, 2010).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=3895\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3895","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3895","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3895"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3895\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3895"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3895"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3895"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}