{"id":3850,"date":"2010-05-18T22:22:04","date_gmt":"2010-02-15T00:30:10","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2010-02-14T09:44:10","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=3850","title":{"rendered":"OR: Show of authority after ticket should have been written made stop unreasonable"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant should have been cited and released, but the officer kept asking questions, and that unreasonably extended the stop. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.publications.ojd.state.or.us\/S057910.htm\">State v. Rodgers<\/a>, 347 Ore. 610, 227 P.3d 695 (2010):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Based on the totality of the circumstances, we conclude that the deputy&#8217;s show of authority that accompanied his request that defendant consent to a patdown and subsequent request that defendant consent to an examination of the contents of defendant&#8217;s pockets occurred after the point that defendant should have been issued a citation or sent on his way. Because the deputy&#8217;s further detention of defendant was a significant limitation on defendant&#8217;s freedom of movement and was not justified by reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, defendant Kirkeby was unlawfully seized in violation of Article I, section 9.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The officer had probable cause to arrest for a felony, and that permitted a search incident of the defendant\u2019s person. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tsc.state.tn.us\/OPINIONS\/tcca\/PDF\/A01\/State%20v%20Lawrence%20D%20Ralph%20Jr.pdf\">State v. Ralph<\/a>, 2010 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 102 (February 10, 2010).*<\/p>\n<p>Defendant\u2019s detention as a passenger was incidental to the stop of the driver, and it was not unreasonably long.  He consented to a search of his eyeglasses case. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.utcourts.gov\/opinions\/appopin\/hurt021110.pdf\">State v. Hurt<\/a>, 2010 UT App 33, 127 P.3d 271, 649 Utah Adv. Rep. 54 (2010).*<\/p>\n<p>The record supports that the defendant consented to a search of her home. \u201cMoreover, we agree with the district court that the mere presence of several police cars and four officers outside Kelley&#8217;s home was insufficient to call into question the voluntariness of Tanya&#8217;s consent to search.\u201d  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ca8.uscourts.gov\/opndir\/10\/02\/091561P.pdf\">United States v. Kelley<\/a>, 594 F.3d 1010 (8th Cir. 2010).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=3850\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3850","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3850","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3850"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3850\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3850"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3850"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3850"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}