Officer after a traffic stop told the defendant that he was \u201cgood to go,\u201d and then tried to engage the defendant in further conversation, which the defendant refused to consent to. Because defendant did not consent, the stop was unreasonably extended without reasonable suspicion. United States v. Flores-Loza, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1934 (D. Utah January 11, 2010).*<\/p>\n
Apartment security\u2019s armed guard detained defendants with reasonable suspicion of breaking into cars on the parking lot, and he called 911 to get the police there. The police had reasonable suspicion when they got there. United States v. McHugh, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1960 (N.D. Okla. January 11, 2010).*<\/p>\n
Officer pulled up behind defendant\u2019s car but did not stop him. The officer engaged him in a consensual encounter, so there was no stop. United States v. Huerta, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2275 (E.D. Tenn. January 12, 2010).*<\/p>\n
Warrantless entry into defendant\u2019s apartment because of feared mental instability of the defendant and his access to a weapon was justified. United States v. Zetterman, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2009 (D. Maine January 11, 2010).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading