{"id":37312,"date":"2019-04-19T14:22:50","date_gmt":"2019-04-19T19:22:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=37312"},"modified":"2019-04-19T14:22:50","modified_gmt":"2019-04-19T19:22:50","slug":"wa-reversal-for-unreasonable-search-of-cell-phone-was-required-not-dismissal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=37312","title":{"rendered":"WA: Reversal for unreasonable search of cell phone was required, not dismissal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The court of appeals erred in dismissing defendant\u2019s case rather than reversing for a new trial after cell phone evidence was suppressed. There was other untainted evidence the state could use to try to convict on a retrial. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.courts.wa.gov\/opinions\/pdf\/960356.pdf\">State v. McKee<\/a>, 2019 Wash. LEXIS 269 (Apr. 18, 2019), rev\u2019g 3 Wn. App. 2d 11, 413 P.3d 1049 (2018).<\/p>\n<p>Defendant was alleged to run a tax fraud business from his home. The affidavit for search warrant effectively provided for an \u201call persons\u201d warrant of those found there as potentially being involved. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.supremecourt.ohio.gov\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/12\/2019\/2019-Ohio-1400.pdf\">State v. Shoults<\/a>, 2019-Ohio-1400, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 1497 (12th Dist. Apr. 15, 2019).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The court of appeals erred in dismissing defendant\u2019s case rather than reversing for a new trial after cell phone evidence was suppressed. There was other untainted evidence the state could use to try to convict on a retrial. State v. &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=37312\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,59],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-37312","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-exclusionary-rule","category-scope-of-search"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37312","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=37312"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37312\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":37313,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37312\/revisions\/37313"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=37312"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=37312"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=37312"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}