A state officer acting on a writ of execution issued by a state court was reasonable. Moreover, plaintiff\u2019s claim is really just a suggestion in a pleading, not in the complaint. Thornton v. Barrett, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53388 (D. Ida. Mar. 29, 2019).*<\/p>\n
A report that a car was stolen was a reasonable basis for stopping it. United States v. Dudley, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52924 (D. Colo. Mar. 28, 2019).*<\/p>\n
\u201cOn appeal, the Fourth Circuit rejected Movant’s claim that the evidence should have been suppressed because of a defective search warrant, holding that, even if the warrant was constitutionally defective, \u2018the district court did not err by finding the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule to be applicable.\u2019 … Therefore, Movant is procedurally barred from repeating the argument on collateral review.\u201d Hersman v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53783 (S.D. W.Va. Mar. 29, 2019).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
A state officer acting on a writ of execution issued by a state court was reasonable. Moreover, plaintiff\u2019s claim is really just a suggestion in a pleading, not in the complaint. Thornton v. Barrett, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53388 (D. … Continue reading