The fact a Louisiana state judge\u2019s warrant under the Stored Communications Act, 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2703, was apparently partly outside the judge\u2019s territorial jurisdiction is not a ground to suppress under \u00a7 2703. \u201cArticle 161(A) states, \u2018a judge may issue a warrant authorizing the search for and seizure of any thing within the territorial jurisdiction of the court ….\u2019 Thus, under section (A), a judge may only issue a warrant when the thing to be searched is within the court’s jurisdiction. However, section (C) of that article states, \u2018[a] judge may also issue a search warrant in all other cases specifically provided by law.\u2019 Here, the state judge was authorized by \u00a7 2703.\u201d United States v. Matthew, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41977 (W.D. La. Mar. 13, 2019).<\/p>\n
Defendant waived his Fourth Amendment claims by his guilty plea. The potential Franks claim he mentions wouldn\u2019t be successful nor get a hearing. United States v. Upshaw, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40888 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2019).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The fact a Louisiana state judge\u2019s warrant under the Stored Communications Act, 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2703, was apparently partly outside the judge\u2019s territorial jurisdiction is not a ground to suppress under \u00a7 2703. \u201cArticle 161(A) states, \u2018a judge may issue … Continue reading