Turning over a car to a transit shipper was a relinquishment of any expectation of privacy in the car because it was left unlocked, the shipper had the keys, and the shipper would be entering it, parking it, and transporting it. \u201cAlthough there is no evidence that Crowder directly authorized the driver to search the vehicle, in light of the circumstances described above it is clear that the driver was \u2018authorized to act in direct contravention to\u2019 Crowder’s privacy interest.\u201d United States v. Crowder, 588 F.3d 929 (7th Cir. 2009).<\/p>\n
Tenth Circuit follows Gant good faith exception under United States v. McCane, 573 F.3d 1037 (10th Cir. 2009), petition for cert. filed, 78 U.S.L.W. 3221 (U.S. Oct. 1, 2009) (No. 09-402) where the search incident would have been invalid under Gant, but in less than confirmatory language. United States v. Davis<\/a>, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 27901 (10th Cir. December 18, 2009).*<\/p>\n Transit police could conduct an investigative stop of plaintiff when he was seen boarding a MARTA train with a holster. State law made it a crime to board public transportation with a firearm. GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117989 (N.D. Ga. December 14, 2009).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading