{"id":36562,"date":"2019-02-26T09:10:36","date_gmt":"2019-02-26T14:10:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=36562"},"modified":"2019-02-26T09:11:17","modified_gmt":"2019-02-26T14:11:17","slug":"oh8-plain-view-of-hit-and-run-vehicle-in-driveway-justified-officers-entry-onto-curtilage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=36562","title":{"rendered":"OH8: Plain view of hit and run vehicle in driveway justified officers&#8217; entry onto curtilage"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant raises his search claim via an ineffective assistance of counsel claim: defense counsel should have suppressed the plain view of his vehicle in his driveway partly covered by a blanket. Officers responded to an anonymous tip that defendant\u2019s SUV was involved in a hit and run that killed two pedestrians in Cleveland. There was video from a bus that caught the hit and run. Defendant\u2019s vehicle matched the vehicle described by witnesses and in the video. The officers&#8217; entry on to his curtilage was reasonable. While the front of the vehicle was partially covered by a blanket, the broken windshield was in plain view in the driveway and from the street. Collins v. Virginia is distinguishable. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.supremecourt.ohio.gov\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/8\/2019\/2019-Ohio-629.pdf\">State v. Kinney<\/a>, 2019-Ohio-629, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 665 (8th Dist. Feb. 22, 2019):<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[*P20]  We find that under the plain view exception to the warrant requirement, the warrantless search of appellant&#8217;s SUV was not in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Appellant&#8217;s vehicle was observed from the street by investigating officers. Investigating officers did not have to shield their eyes as they observed the SUV&#8217;s damaged windshield. Id. The SUV was partially in the garage with the front end partially out in to the driveway. The officers were lawfully present at appellant&#8217;s house to follow up on an anonymous tip. Because these officers had a lawful right to be at appellant&#8217;s residence based on this tip, the officers had a lawful right of access to the evidence. See State v. Young, 2015-Ohio-1347, 31 N.E.3d 178 (12th Dist.) (plain view exception applied because evidence was viewed outside on the defendant&#8217;s patio where the officer had a right to be because officers had received an alert that defendant&#8217;s girlfriend was attempting to purchase pseudoephedrine for the manufacture of methamphetamine). Lastly, it was immediately apparent that the property seized was incriminating on its face, i.e., appellant&#8217;s SUV matched the SUV in the RTA bus video and the damage to the windshield was consistent with the damage as observed in the video.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant raises his search claim via an ineffective assistance of counsel claim: defense counsel should have suppressed the plain view of his vehicle in his driveway partly covered by a blanket. Officers responded to an anonymous tip that defendant\u2019s SUV &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=36562\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36562","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-curtilage"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36562","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=36562"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36562\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":36564,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36562\/revisions\/36564"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=36562"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=36562"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=36562"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}