{"id":36555,"date":"2019-02-26T08:48:04","date_gmt":"2019-02-26T13:48:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=36555"},"modified":"2019-02-26T08:48:04","modified_gmt":"2019-02-26T13:48:04","slug":"in-walk-through-of-house-for-non-investigatory-reason-after-unconscious-person-taken-to-hospital-justified-by-community-caretaking-function","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=36555","title":{"rendered":"IN: Walk through of house for non-investigatory reason after unconscious person taken to hospital justified by community caretaking function"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Officers responded to a 911 call that a child was unconscious. After the child went to the hospital and the parent went in police vehicle, an officer at the scene did a walk through to insure there was no one else or animals left there and then secure the house. Blood spots were seen. Before the officer could leave, he received a call the child had died. He secured the house for a search warrant. The warrantless walk through and observations were valid based on the community caretaking function. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.in.gov\/judiciary\/opinions\/pdf\/02221901par.pdf\">Price v. State<\/a>, 2019 Ind. App. LEXIS 82 (Feb. 22, 2019).<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>P29 Secondly, we note that &#8220;[t]he very point of exigent circumstances is that officers are confronted with a situation where time is of the essence and immediate action required.&#8221; Montgomery, 904 N.E.2d at 381. As stated by the Supreme Court, &#8220;[w]e do not question the right of the police to respond to emergency situations &#8230;. The need to protect or preserve life or avoid serious injury is justification for what would be otherwise illegal.&#8221; Mincey v. Arizona, 437 U.S. 385, 392-93, 98 S.Ct. 2408, 57 L.Ed.2d 290 (1978). We cannot find many situations more urgent than a child who has been found unconscious, was on his way to the hospital, and an officer&#8217;s need to save that child&#8217;s life by looking for apparent dangerous substances in the apartment that the child might possibly have consumed, and in turn offering that information to doctors to aid in the child&#8217;s treatment. Additionally, we note that unlike the majority of cases discussing exigent circumstances, Detective Richhart&#8217;s entry was not motivated by an intent to apprehend a suspect or to seize incriminating evidence. See, e.g., McDermott, 877 N.E.2d at 474. One of the concerns Detective Richhart had prior to entering Price&#8217;s apartment was to assist the doctors with any information that would aid in B.P.&#8217;s treatment. Detective Richhart was unaware that B.P. had died when he performed his cursory sweep, and the record is silent as to whether the walkthrough was geared at gathering incriminating evidence.<\/p>\n<p>P30 Moreover, we find that Detective Richhart&#8217;s warrantless entry into Price&#8217;s home constituted a legitimate exercise of the community caretaking function of the police. &#8230;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Officers responded to a 911 call that a child was unconscious. After the child went to the hospital and the parent went in police vehicle, an officer at the scene did a walk through to insure there was no one &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=36555\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[74],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36555","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-community-caretaking-function"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36555","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=36555"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36555\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":36556,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36555\/revisions\/36556"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=36555"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=36555"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=36555"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}