{"id":3576,"date":"2009-11-29T12:01:56","date_gmt":"2009-11-29T11:24:22","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2009-11-29T12:01:56","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=3576","title":{"rendered":"CFC: No jurisdiction over a Fourth Amendment claim"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Court of Federal Claims lacks jurisdiction over <a href=\"http:\/\/caselaw.lp.findlaw.com\/scripts\/getcase.pl?court=us&amp;vol=403&amp;invol=388\">Bivens<\/a> claims against individual officers. [The Court of Federal Claims has no jurisdiction over what happens in the criminal justice system.] Taylor v. United States, 2008 U.S. Claims LEXIS 462 (October 29, 2008):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Nothing in plaintiffs&#8217; complaint raises the specter of an unreasonable search and seizure by defendant. More fundamentally, for purposes of this court&#8217;s jurisdictional analysis, the Fourth Amendment is not a money-mandating constitutional provision. See, e.g., Fry v. United States, 72 Fed. Cl. 500, 507 (2006) (&#8220;As a matter of law, the Fourth Amendment&#8217;s prohibition on unreasonable search and seizure &#8230; [is] not money-mandating.&#8221;); Hanford v. United States, 63 Fed. Cl. 111, 119 (2004) (&#8220;&#8216;[V]iolations of 4th [A]mendment search and seizure&#8217; are &#8216;excluded&#8217; from the jurisdiction of this court because the Fourth Amendment is not a money-mandating constitutional provision.&#8221; (quoting Stephenson v. United States, 58 Fed. Cl. 186, 192 (2003))). Furthermore, although the Supreme Court held in Bivens &#8220;that a party may, under certain circumstances, bring an action for violations of constitutional rights against Government officials in their individual capacities[,] &#8230; [t]he Tucker Act grants the Court of Federal Claims jurisdiction over suits against the United States, not against individual federal officers.&#8221; Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed. Cir. 1997). The court, therefore, lacks jurisdiction to entertain these claims.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=3576\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3576","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3576","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3576"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3576\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3576"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3576"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3576"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}