The fact something was extracted from defendant\u2019s iPod in April but not turned over to the defense until August isn\u2019t a ground to dismiss. United States v. Taylor, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206364 (W.D. Wash. Dec. 7, 2018).<\/p>\n
There was probable cause: \u201cBased on my review of the evidence, I find that the Application for the 4181 Leidy Avenue Search Warrant was supported by probable cause because it included information from confidential informants, summaries of seven controlled buys, summaries of intercepted conversations that related to Toney’s drug transactions, and surveillance of Toney’s participation in drug trafficking activities.\u201d United States v. Toney, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206534 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 4, 2018).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The fact something was extracted from defendant\u2019s iPod in April but not turned over to the defense until August isn\u2019t a ground to dismiss. United States v. Taylor, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206364 (W.D. Wash. Dec. 7, 2018). There was … Continue reading