The CI\u2019s participation in the controlled buy that led to a search warrant doesn\u2019t make the CI an \u201cactive participant\u201d in the crime where that\u2019s only the basis for issuance of the warrant and it\u2019s not a separate charge. United States v. Loden, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 204069 (E.D. Tenn. Dec. 3, 2018).<\/p>\n
Defendant\u2019s car was stopped for 105 in an 80, and basic questions led to all kinds of reasonable suspicion that something was up. Also, Mrs. Rodriguez was eight months pregnant and there was a medical emergency. But they were going to her grandmother\u2019s house. Reasonable suspicion had developed, including that her and the driver had a protective order between them. Rodriguez v. State<\/a>, 2018 WY 134. 2018 Wyo. LEXIS 140 (Dec. 4, 2018).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The CI\u2019s participation in the controlled buy that led to a search warrant doesn\u2019t make the CI an \u201cactive participant\u201d in the crime where that\u2019s only the basis for issuance of the warrant and it\u2019s not a separate charge. United … Continue reading