\u201cAfter looking at the collective knowledge of law enforcement at the time of the arrest\u2014which includes four eyewitness identifications, one voice identification, and a tip from the defendant’s own girlfriend turning him in for the People’s Bank robbery\u2014the court finds there was probable cause to arrest the defendant.\u201d When the car was being stopped by a PIT maneuver, defendant fled from the car, and he waived any reasonable expectation of privacy in it by doing so. \u201cBased on the record, the court finds that the defendant has not carried his burden to show that Redwine’s consent was coerced.\u201d [And that\u2019s wrong because the burden is on the government for consent, but that\u2019s moot because] Defendant also consented to a search. United States v. Gibbs, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 204505 (N.D. Ga. Dec. 4, 2018).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u201cAfter looking at the collective knowledge of law enforcement at the time of the arrest\u2014which includes four eyewitness identifications, one voice identification, and a tip from the defendant’s own girlfriend turning him in for the People’s Bank robbery\u2014the court finds … Continue reading