\u201cThe trial court ordered Defendant Aaron Lee Gordon to enroll in lifetime satellite-based monitoring following his eventual release from prison. Defendant appeals. Because the State cannot establish at this time that Defendant’s submission to satellite-based monitoring will constitute a reasonable Fourth Amendment search in the future, upon Defendant’s release from prison, we vacate the trial court’s civil order mandating satellite-based monitoring.\u201d State v. Gordon, 2018 N.C. App. LEXIS 889 (Sep. 4, 2018).<\/p>\n
\u201cFred Dravis … appeals from the trial court’s order requiring him to submit to satellite-based monitoring (\u2018SBM\u2019) for a period of five years. Because prior decisions from this Court mandate the conclusion that the State failed to meet its burden of showing that the imposition of SBM was a reasonable search under the Fourth Amendment as to Defendant, we reverse.\u201d State v. Dravis, 2018 N.C. App. LEXIS 875 (Sep. 4, 2018).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u201cThe trial court ordered Defendant Aaron Lee Gordon to enroll in lifetime satellite-based monitoring following his eventual release from prison. Defendant appeals. Because the State cannot establish at this time that Defendant’s submission to satellite-based monitoring will constitute a reasonable … Continue reading