Alleged isolated violation of Posse Comitatus Act doesn\u2019t require exclusion. McGill v. United States, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142130 (N.D. Ga. Aug. 22, 2018).<\/p>\n
Trash cans were left at the street for collection of the contents, so there was no reasonable expectation of privacy in them. Failure to object to the R&R provides for only clear error of search warrant issue, and there was probable cause. United States v. Holmes, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141684 (W.D. N.C. Aug. 21, 2018).*<\/p>\n
Plaintiff was arrested at work for accessing child pornography on office computers. His employer wanted his vehicle removed so he wouldn\u2019t come back. The removal of the vehicle was thus proper under the community caretaking function. Boudreau v. Lussier<\/a>, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 23283 (1st Cir. Aug. 21, 2018).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Alleged isolated violation of Posse Comitatus Act doesn\u2019t require exclusion. McGill v. United States, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142130 (N.D. Ga. Aug. 22, 2018). Trash cans were left at the street for collection of the contents, so there was no … Continue reading