{"id":33677,"date":"2018-07-01T10:22:18","date_gmt":"2018-07-01T15:22:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=33677"},"modified":"2018-07-01T10:22:43","modified_gmt":"2018-07-01T15:22:43","slug":"ca-carpenters-search-warrant-requirement-does-not-apply-to-cell-phone-records-merely-used-to-show-that-co-conspirators-communicated-with-each-other","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=33677","title":{"rendered":"Cal.: Carpenter<\/em>‘s search warrant requirement does not apply to cell phone records merely used to show that co-conspirators communicated with each other"},"content":{"rendered":"

Carpenter’s search warrant requirement does not apply to cell phone records merely used to show that co-conspirators communicated with each other. In light of the whole trial, it wasn\u2019t all that important. People v. Anderson<\/a>, 2018 Cal. LEXIS 4698 (June 28, 2018).<\/p>\n

Blocking defendant\u2019s vehicle to keep it from leaving is a seizure, and it had to be based on reasonable suspicion. \u201cIn this case, when the officers seized Harger’s vehicle, the only information known to them consisted of (1) the two anonymous tips; (2) Harger’s location, across the street from a youth center; and (3) Griffin’s professed knowledge that the Bayview neighborhood of San Francisco is a \u2018narcotics-prone and violent crime-prone area.\u2019 See Griffin Decl. \u00b6\u00b6 2-6. This information did not provide reasonable suspicion to justify seizure of Harger’s vehicle under the Fourth Amendment.\u201d United States v. Harger, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107698 (N.D. Cal. June 28, 2018).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Carpenter’s search warrant requirement does not apply to cell phone records merely used to show that co-conspirators communicated with each other. In light of the whole trial, it wasn\u2019t all that important. People v. Anderson, 2018 Cal. LEXIS 4698 (June … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,69],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33677","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cell-phones","category-seizure"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33677","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=33677"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33677\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33679,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33677\/revisions\/33679"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=33677"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=33677"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=33677"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}