A court order for cell phone detail information under 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2703(d) requires only reasonable suspicion, following In re Applications of the United States of Am. for an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2703(d), 206 F. Supp. 3d 454, 455-56 (D.D.C. 2016). United States v. Wright, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63851 (D. Nev. Apr. 16, 2018).*<\/p>\n
Defendant claims there is a missing warrant and defense counsel didn\u2019t follow up and do anything about it to litigate. The claim is entirely speculative. There\u2019s no indication there is a warrant, and defense counsel can\u2019t be ineffective for not pursuing that which does not exist. Sheehan v. United States, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63894 (E.D. N.Y. Apr. 17, 2018).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
A court order for cell phone detail information under 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2703(d) requires only reasonable suspicion, following In re Applications of the United States of Am. for an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2703(d), 206 F. Supp. 3d … Continue reading