{"id":3242,"date":"2009-12-23T05:05:59","date_gmt":"2009-07-12T10:25:49","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2009-07-12T10:25:49","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=3242","title":{"rendered":"CA8: Removing defendant&#8217;s bag from Greyhound bus was a seizure"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Defendant&#8217;s stop was not too long, and the district court erred in granting the motion to suppress. The length of the stop was added to by defendant&#8217;s &#8220;confused answers&#8221; to basic questions. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ca8.uscourts.gov\/opndir\/09\/07\/082538P.pdf\">United States v. Rivera<\/a>, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 14746 (8th Cir. July 6, 2009).*<\/p>\n<p>Removing defendant&#8217;s bag from a Greyhound bus effectively seized him, relying on United States v. Va Lerie, 424 F.3d 694 (8th Cir. 2005) (en banc). <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ca8.uscourts.gov\/opndir\/09\/07\/082647P.pdf\">United States v. Alvarez-Manzo<\/a>, 570 F.3d 1070 (8th Cir. 2009).*<\/p>\n<p>Stop for speeding and then ordering defendant from his vehicle was reasonable. United States v. Anderson, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57381 (E.D. Va. July 6, 2009).*<\/p>\n<p>Once the cat was out of the bag as to the officers&#8217; presence, a warrantless entry was permitted under <a href=\"http:\/\/caselaw.lp.findlaw.com\/scripts\/getcase.pl?court=us&amp;vol=468&amp;invol=796\">Segura<\/a>. The court already found that the officers would have otherwise gotten a search warrant and already had probable cause. United States v. Etchin, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109187 (W.D. Wis. December 18, 2008).*<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.supremecourtus.gov\/opinions\/08pdf\/07-542.pdf\">Gant<\/a> came along after the USMJ made his R&amp;R, but it did not alter the outcome. Defendant was stopped for a noise violation and officers saw an open container. Based on circumstances, they had reason to believe a gun would be in the console. That search occurred after defendant was handcuffed and walking to a police car. United States v. Bullock, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58080 (E.D. Wis. June 23, 2009).*<\/p>\n<p>Reviewing and signing a consent form that said that the consenter could refuse consent showed that the consent was valid. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ca11.uscourts.gov\/unpub\/ops\/200910018.pdf\">United States v. Myers<\/a>, 335 Fed. Appx. 936 (11th Cir. 2009) (unpublished).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=3242\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3242","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3242","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3242"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3242\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3242"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3242"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3242"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}