\u201cIn search and seizure cases, when officers rely on a judicially secured warrant, they are generally entitled to qualified immunity.\u201d Plaintiff claimed false information was provided for the warrant, but he fails in his burden of showing a fact question on that on summary judgment. Blevins v. Kirk, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45651 (E.D. Ky. Mar. 20, 2018).*<\/p>\n
An area was know for residential burglaries. On the night defendant was stopped, it was really cold, hardly anybody else was out. When confronted, defendant\u2019s actions added to reasonable suspicion for a frisk. United States v. Gibson, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45472 (N.D. Ind. Mar. 20, 2018).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u201cIn search and seizure cases, when officers rely on a judicially secured warrant, they are generally entitled to qualified immunity.\u201d Plaintiff claimed false information was provided for the warrant, but he fails in his burden of showing a fact question … Continue reading