{"id":3205,"date":"2009-12-23T07:34:08","date_gmt":"2009-06-24T08:48:03","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2009-06-24T08:48:03","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=3205","title":{"rendered":"RI: Photos on digital camera from work showed nexus for SW for defendant&#8217;s house for similar pictures"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The state showed nexus to defendant&#8217;s house for a search warrant. On his digital camera were found upskirt pictures of a minor, and it was reasonable to assume that, although the crime occurred in defendant&#8217;s business, that additional pictures would be found in his home. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.courts.state.ri.us\/supreme\/pdf-files\/08-27.pdf\">State v. Byrne<\/a>, 972 A.2d 633 (R.I. 2009):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The trial justice failed to articulate what additional underlying facts were, in his view, necessary to establish a reasonable inference that defendant took the camera home. In this case, the affiant alleged that defendant took several pictures of the child-victim&#8217;s undergarments with a camera and further alleged that, in several shots, the camera was focused under the child&#8217;s skirt. Although the alleged crime occurred at defendant&#8217;s place of business, and the only reference to defendant&#8217;s home was in the final paragraph of the affidavit (although the home was described with particularity in the warrant), it is our view that a reasonable inference could be drawn from these facts that the camera&#8211;the instrumentality of the crime and a handheld, easily transportable item of personal property&#8211;could be found at defendant&#8217;s residence. Short of surveillance or actual observation of defendant taking the camera home, we are hard-pressed to envision what additional facts connecting the camera to defendant&#8217;s home could be alleged to support this inference. Evidence of actual observation is not a constitutional prerequisite for a finding of probable cause.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Trial court&#8217;s grant of a motion to suppress of the frisk of the defendant was against the preponderance of the evidence.  The defendant&#8217;s actions created at least suspicion that he was armed and justified the frisk. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tsc.state.tn.us\/OPINIONS\/tcca\/PDF\/092\/State%20v%20Thomas%20D%20Moffat.pdf\">State v. Moffatt<\/a>, 2009 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 438 (June 12, 2009).*<\/p>\n<p>Court finds defendant&#8217;s claim that she thought she was signing a search warrant and not a consent to search was not credible. United States v. Porter, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52183 (E.D. Wis. June 19, 2009).*<\/p>\n<p>Defendant&#8217;s failure to file a motion to suppress before trial was a waiver of the motion. United States v. Thomas, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52331 (E.D. Mo. June 18, 2009).*<\/p>\n<p>Officer had reasonable suspicion that the defendant&#8217;s vehicle was involved in a crime where two identified vehicles fled the scene and were seen a mile away. When the cars were seen again, the officers had reasonable suspicion. That led to defendant&#8217;s arrest, and the resulting inventory of his car was valid. <a href=\"http:\/\/caselaw.lp.findlaw.com\/data2\/delawarestatecases\/372-2008.pdf\">Lecates v. State<\/a>, 975 A.2d 799 (Del. 2009).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=3205\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3205","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3205","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3205"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3205\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3205"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3205"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3205"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}