This defendant moved to join the motion to suppress the search of a codefendant, but \u201cSantilli’s Motion for Joinder does not provide any details about how McGuire’s Objection applies to a search or seizure of Santilli’s property or an invasion of his privacy.\u201d United States v. McGuire, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18135 (D. Nev. Feb. 5, 2018).*<\/p>\n
Defendant knew during the plea colloquy that he was giving up the right to appeal the denial of suppression motion. Therefore, defense counsel wasn\u2019t ineffective. Garza v. United States, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18026 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 5, 2018).*<\/p>\n
Defense counsel wasn\u2019t ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress where defendant\u2019s 2255 argument about the search warrant wasn\u2019t even coherent about why there was no probable cause.
\nUnited States v. Heard, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18063 (E.D. Ky. Feb. 5, 2018).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
This defendant moved to join the motion to suppress the search of a codefendant, but \u201cSantilli’s Motion for Joinder does not provide any details about how McGuire’s Objection applies to a search or seizure of Santilli’s property or an invasion … Continue reading