{"id":31573,"date":"2018-01-29T00:01:27","date_gmt":"2018-01-29T05:01:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=31573"},"modified":"2018-01-27T18:31:12","modified_gmt":"2018-01-27T23:31:12","slug":"fl4-exigency-required-finding-defs-cell-phone-to-locate-a-school-bus-stop-shooter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=31573","title":{"rendered":"FL4: Exigency required finding def&#8217;s cell phone to locate a school bus stop shooter"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Exigent circumstances in finding a shooter at a school bus stop necessitated the officers pinging the cell phone to locate the shooter. Defense counsel wasn&#8217;t ineffective for not challenging the search because it would have failed. <a href=\"https:\/\/edca.4dca.org\/DCADocs\/2016\/0280\/160280_1257_01242018_08471339_i.pdf\">Barton v. State<\/a>, 2018 Fla. App. LEXIS 872 (Fla. 4th DCA Jan. 25, 2018):<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In Riley v. California, the U.S. Supreme Court acknowledged &#8220;[o]ne well-recognized exception&#8221; to the search warrant requirement\u2014an &#8220;exigencies of the situation&#8221; exception that could include &#8220;pursu[ing] a fleeing suspect.&#8221; 134 S. Ct. 2473, 2494, 189 L. Ed. 2d 430 (2014) (quoting Kentucky v. King, 563 U.S. 452, 460, 131 S. Ct. 1849, 179 L. Ed. 2d 865 (2011)).<\/p>\n<p>To determine whether an exigent circumstance exists, we look to the totality of the circumstances and consider various factors, including:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>(1) the gravity or violent nature of the offense with which the suspect is to be charged; (2) a reasonable belief that the suspect is armed; (3) probable cause to believe that the suspect committed the crime; (4) strong reason to believe that the suspect is in the premises being entered; and (5) a likelihood that delay could cause the escape of the suspect or the destruction of essential evidence, or jeopardize the safety of officers or the public.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>United States v. Standridge, 810 F.2d 1034, 1037 (11th Cir. 1987); accord Herring v. State, 168 So. 3d 240, 243 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).<\/p>\n<p>In this case, any delay in finding the gunman may have had catastrophic consequences. At the time of the search, police knew the gunman fired several bullets towards fifteen to twenty-five students at a bus stop near an elementary school; a student was seriously injured; the gunman had not been detained; and the gun had not been located. These circumstances dictated a prompt response on the part of the authorities to discover the gunman&#8217;s identity. See United States v. Caraballo, 831 F.3d 95, 104 (2d Cir. 2016) (holding that officers&#8217; warrantless pinging of the defendant&#8217;s cell phone was justified under the exigent circumstances exception in part because the defendant, who had just brutally killed a victim execution style, was still likely armed and on the loose).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Exigent circumstances in finding a shooter at a school bus stop necessitated the officers pinging the cell phone to locate the shooter. Defense counsel wasn&#8217;t ineffective for not challenging the search because it would have failed. Barton v. State, 2018 &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=31573\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,3,23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-31573","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cell-phones","category-emergency-exigency","category-ineffective-assistance"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31573","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=31573"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31573\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31574,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31573\/revisions\/31574"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=31573"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=31573"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=31573"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}