The officer\u2019s minor errors on the paperwork for the inventory don\u2019t show that was pretextual for a criminal search or otherwise unreasonable. United States v. Lillard, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6613 (D. Neb. Jan. 16, 2018) (wrong vehicle model, failing to circle whether defendant had been arrested or not, omission of beer can in console (not a valuable item).<\/p>\n
Defendant refused a PBT by remaining silent when asked and then put chewing tobacco in his mouth after being told that nothing should go in his mouth for the test. \u201cBecause we conclude Jones refused the PBT, the deputy properly invoked the implied consent procedure based on that refusal, and the district court was correct in denying Jones’s motion to suppress the chemical test results. We affirm Jones’s conviction and sentence.\u201d State v. Jones<\/a>, 2018 Iowa App. LEXIS 44 (Jan. 16, 2018).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The officer\u2019s minor errors on the paperwork for the inventory don\u2019t show that was pretextual for a criminal search or otherwise unreasonable. United States v. Lillard, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6613 (D. Neb. Jan. 16, 2018) (wrong vehicle model, failing … Continue reading