A shots fired call led to the stop of defendant\u2019s car. The officer\u2019s seeing spent shell casings inside was probable cause, and the reasonable suspicion calculus of extending the stop doesn\u2019t apply. United States v. Cooper, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1571 (E.D. Ky. Jan. 4, 2018).<\/p>\n
Defendant\u2019s traffic stop for no seat belt was probable cause for a stop. Defendant\u2019s actions during the stop gave reasonable suspicion for more. Finally, the record supports the conclusion he consented to a search of the vehicle. People v. Cummings<\/a>, 2018 NY Slip Op 00043, 2018 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48 (3d Dept. Jan. 4, 2018).*<\/p>\n There was a GPS tracker on defendant\u2019s RV placed by court order. The traffic stop was based on a suspended DL and a search warrant for the vehicle already issued. United States v. Parr, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1534 (N.D. W.Va. Jan. 4, 2018).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" A shots fired call led to the stop of defendant\u2019s car. The officer\u2019s seeing spent shell casings inside was probable cause, and the reasonable suspicion calculus of extending the stop doesn\u2019t apply. United States v. Cooper, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading