Court credits officers\u2019 testimony that defendant consented to the search and understood English well enough. United States v. Santamaria, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35823 (E.D. Mich. April 29, 2009).*<\/p>\n
911 call about a home invasion at plaintiffs\u2019 address justified the police coming and entering without a warrant. Alford v. Pousak, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35829 (E.D. Mich. April 29, 2009).*<\/p>\n
Executing a bench warrant for arrest did not authorize a nighttime entry since a separate showing of need is required for a nighttime entry. Perez v. Borough of Berwick, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35778 (M.D. Pa. April 28, 2009).*<\/p>\n
Search warrant could authorize a search for all persons on the premises. United States v. Hicks, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36145 (E.D. Va. April 27, 2009).*<\/p>\n
Court credits officer\u2019s testimony that he could see marijuana seeds with his flashlight through the tinted windows of defendant\u2019s car, and that was a valid plain view. United States v. Drake, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35854 (E.D. Mo. April 16, 2009).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading