The court finds defendant consented to a search of his bag on a bus by a shrug of his shoulders. United States v. Salas-Lopez, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212709 (W.D. Mo. Nov. 16, 2017), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212286 (W.D. Mo. Dec. 28, 2017).<\/p>\n
\u201cThe specificity of the vehicle description, the reference to seizure of drug proceeds, and the attestations of a nexus between the vehicle and drug proceeds lead us to conclude the constitutional particularity requirement was satisfied.\u201d State v. Ford<\/a>, 2017 Iowa App. LEXIS 1264 (Dec. 20, 2017).*<\/p>\n AFOSI CI\u2019s controlled buy from defendant was probable cause for issuance of a search warrant for his house. The CI went to defendant\u2019s house and made the buy. People v. Gallo<\/a>, 2017 Guam 24, 2017 Guam LEXIS 23 (Dec. 29, 2017).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The court finds defendant consented to a search of his bag on a bus by a shrug of his shoulders. United States v. Salas-Lopez, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212709 (W.D. Mo. Nov. 16, 2017), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212286 … Continue reading