{"id":3038,"date":"2009-12-25T06:18:49","date_gmt":"2009-04-02T07:21:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2009-04-02T07:21:00","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=3038","title":{"rendered":"ID: Blocking door with foot was crossing the threshold for Fourth Amendment purposes"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Defense counsel were not ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress defendant&#8217;s search by a security guard who was not a state actor. [Defendant was operating under advice from a jailhouse lawyer that the issue was viable.] <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wicourts.gov\/ca\/opinion\/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&amp;seqNo=35951\">State v. Butler<\/a>, 2009 WI App 52, 317 Wis. 2d 515, 768 N.W.2d 46 (2009).*<\/p>\n<p>Officers were justified in an exigent entry because an apparent burglar was lurking at the window before the officer got to the door, and the people inside were unusually guarded [like there was somebody inside holding them hostage]. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.isc.idaho.gov\/opinions\/Araiza,%20Roy.pdf\">State v. Araiza<\/a>, 209 P.3d 668 (Ida. App. 2009).*<\/p>\n<p>Officer came to a motel room called by management because of marijuana smoking. He did a knock-and-talk and marijuana smoke came out the door. His using his foot to block the door from shutting was a search by crossing the threshold. Consent thereafter was invalid. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.isc.idaho.gov\/opinions\/Hudson-opn.pdf\">State v. Hudson<\/a>, 209 P.3d 196 (Ida. App. 2009):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The police officer&#8217;s unlawful entry into Hudson&#8217;s motel room was a violation of the Fourth Amendment&#8217;s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures. The unlawful entry never ended; therefore, the search and acquisition of the incriminating evidence was contemporaneous with the unlawful activity. No intervening circumstances existed which would independently justify the ongoing, unlawful entry. Thus, Hudson&#8217;s consent to the search of his motel room was rendered invalid and the incriminating evidence acquired during the search must be suppressed as the fruit of the Fourth Amendment violation.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Officers had reasonable suspicion to detain the defendants for aggravated robbery, and that justified handcuffing them. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sconet.state.oh.us\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/2\/2009\/2009-ohio-1407.pdf\">State v. Doakes<\/a>, 2009 Ohio 1407, 2009 Ohio App. LEXIS 1177 (2d Dist. March 27, 2009).*<\/p>\n<p>Defendant&#8217;s search incident was justified by the outstanding warrant for her arrest, not the automobile exception. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sconet.state.oh.us\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/2\/2009\/2009-ohio-1411.pdf\">State v. Gray<\/a>, 2009 Ohio 1411, 2009 Ohio App. LEXIS 1175 (2d Dist. March 27, 2009).*<\/p>\n<p>Delegation of a federal search warrant to a tribal SWAT team was not a violation of Rule 41 because tribal officers are &#8220;federal officers.&#8221; Casillas v. United States, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25662 (D. Ariz. February 11, 2009).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=3038\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3038","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3038","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3038"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3038\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3038"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3038"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3038"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}