{"id":30266,"date":"2017-11-23T04:29:52","date_gmt":"2017-11-23T09:29:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=30266"},"modified":"2017-11-23T04:29:52","modified_gmt":"2017-11-23T09:29:52","slug":"tx13-if-a-motion-to-suppress-was-made-under-mcneely-it-would-have-been-granted-def-received-iac","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=30266","title":{"rendered":"TX13: If a motion to suppress was made under McNeely it would have been granted; def received IAC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Defense counsel\u2019s misapprehension of the application of McNeely to blood test results was ineffective assistance of counsel. If a motion to suppress had been made, it would have been granted. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.search.txcourts.gov\/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaVersionID=5b4e092a-1756-4cba-905c-206f26608050&#038;MediaID=30189661-26d5-4eb4-90fc-69b8cbf2af08&#038;coa=%22%20+%20this.CurrentWebState.CurrentCourt%20+%20@%22&#038;DT=Opinion\">Briggs v. State<\/a>, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 10891 (Tex. App. \u2013 Corpus Christi &#8211; Edinburgh Nov. 21, 2017).<\/p>\n<p>The state administrative subpoena for medical records in a medical board investigation was reasonable and thus didn\u2019t violate the Fourth Amendment. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.search.txcourts.gov\/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaVersionID=e196eb6f-bbbe-44c6-b48c-0463ea0127d9&#038;MediaID=ae45a329-1390-4f48-9972-115d5a433217&#038;coa=%22%20+%20this.CurrentWebState.CurrentCourt%20+%20@%22&#038;DT=Opinion\">Allibone v. Robinson<\/a>, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 10883 (Tex. App. \u2013 Austin Nov. 21, 2017)*; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.search.txcourts.gov\/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaVersionID=a112f5ef-bfad-4067-974c-53e3790beeb1&#038;MediaID=448cde63-6043-4a8b-af57-cdbe0ff94329&#038;coa=%22%20+%20this.CurrentWebState.CurrentCourt%20+%20@%22&#038;DT=Opinion\">Allibone v. Robinson<\/a>, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 10884 (Tex. App. \u2013 Austin Nov. 21, 2017).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Defense counsel\u2019s misapprehension of the application of McNeely to blood test results was ineffective assistance of counsel. If a motion to suppress had been made, it would have been granted. Briggs v. State, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 10891 (Tex. App. &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=30266\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[55,23,81],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-30266","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-drug-testing","category-ineffective-assistance","category-subpoenas"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30266","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=30266"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30266\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":30267,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30266\/revisions\/30267"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=30266"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=30266"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=30266"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}