Search incident to arrest on a DOC warrant was valid. Search incident of his backpack in the car wasn\u2019t valid, but it was by inventory and thus inevitable discovery. United States v. Vang, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161227 (D. Minn. July 25, 2017), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158774 (D. Minn. Sept. 27, 2017).<\/p>\n
The defense proffer in the motion to suppress leads to denial: \u201cApplying this precedent to the totality of the circumstances proffered in Everett’s motion reveals that an objectively reasonable law enforcement officer established a ‘fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime’ would be found in Everett’s vehicle, sufficiently substantiating a finding of probable cause.\u201d United States v. Everett, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157289 (W.D. Pa. Sept. 26, 2017).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Search incident to arrest on a DOC warrant was valid. Search incident of his backpack in the car wasn\u2019t valid, but it was by inventory and thus inevitable discovery. United States v. Vang, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161227 (D. Minn. … Continue reading