Defendant was charged with murder of another inmate in ADX Florence. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his prison cell from a search, and photographing his body was reasonable and not an invasion of privacy. United States v. Santiago, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190098 (D. Colo. July 22, 2016).<\/p>\n
The officer\u2019s testimony was clear and direct, and the court finds reasonable suspicion on the totality of circumstances. Two prior disciplinaries of the officer didn\u2019t undermine his credibility because they were unrelated. United States v. Black, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151910 (W.D. N.C. Sept. 19, 2017),* adopting 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153079 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 18, 2017).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendant was charged with murder of another inmate in ADX Florence. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his prison cell from a search, and photographing his body was reasonable and not an invasion of privacy. United States v. … Continue reading