{"id":28827,"date":"2017-08-29T00:00:40","date_gmt":"2017-08-29T05:00:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=28827"},"modified":"2017-08-27T09:33:30","modified_gmt":"2017-08-27T14:33:30","slug":"ca10-that-search-violated-co-const-was-not-an-issue-for-federal-court-on-habeas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=28827","title":{"rendered":"CA10: That search violated CO Const. was not an issue for federal court (on habeas)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Petitioner\u2019s habeas argument that the search of his home violated the Colorado Constitution has nothing to do with a federal conviction where the search complied with the Fourth Amendment. In any event, he already lost on that issue in the direct appeal. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ca10.uscourts.gov\/opinions\/17\/17-3142.pdf\">Warren v. United States<\/a>, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 16171 (10th Cir. Aug. 24, 2017).*<\/p>\n<p>There was no objective evidence or even subjective evidence that there was any reason to believe that there was an exigency for a warrantless entry. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.publications.ojd.state.or.us\/docs\/A158936.pdf\">State v. Stanley<\/a>, 287 Ore. App. 399, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 1009 (Aug. 23, 2017).*<\/p>\n<p>After defendant\u2019s stop with reasonable suspicion, the smell of marijuana enabled the officer to go further. <a href=\"http:\/\/media.ca11.uscourts.gov\/opinions\/unpub\/files\/201615903.pdf\">United States v. Gerald<\/a>, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 16190 (11th Cir. Aug. 24, 2017).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Petitioner\u2019s habeas argument that the search of his home violated the Colorado Constitution has nothing to do with a federal conviction where the search complied with the Fourth Amendment. In any event, he already lost on that issue in the &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=28827\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,53],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28827","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-emergency-exigency","category-state-constitution"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28827","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=28827"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28827\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":28828,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28827\/revisions\/28828"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=28827"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=28827"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=28827"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}