{"id":28467,"date":"2017-08-05T09:34:20","date_gmt":"2017-08-05T14:34:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=28467"},"modified":"2017-08-05T09:34:20","modified_gmt":"2017-08-05T14:34:20","slug":"ca9-officers-call-to-defs-po-during-stop-didnt-unreasonably-prolong-it-and-po-requested-search","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=28467","title":{"rendered":"CA9: Officer&#8217;s call to def&#8217;s PO during stop didn&#8217;t unreasonably prolong it, and PO requested search"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The officer\u2019s call to defendant\u2019s PO during his traffic stop did not unreasonably prolong the stop. The PO separately had reasonable suspicion for a search and requested one. <a href=\"http:\/\/cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov\/datastore\/memoranda\/2017\/08\/02\/15-30144.pdf\">United States v. Seugasala<\/a>, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 14173 (9th Cir. Aug. 2, 2017).<\/p>\n<p>Where the first search warrant for defendant\u2019s property was held valid, it wasn\u2019t ineffective assistance of counsel for defense counsel to stipulate to the second warrant. And, it was valid anyway. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.supremecourt.ohio.gov\/rod\/docs\/pdf\/4\/2017\/2017-Ohio-7057.pdf\">State v. Ralston<\/a>, 2017-Ohio-7057, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 3183 (4th Dist. July 25, 2017).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The officer\u2019s call to defendant\u2019s PO during his traffic stop did not unreasonably prolong the stop. The PO separately had reasonable suspicion for a search and requested one. United States v. Seugasala, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 14173 (9th Cir. Aug. &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=28467\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23,58],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28467","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ineffective-assistance","category-probationparole-search"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28467","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=28467"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28467\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":28468,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28467\/revisions\/28468"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=28467"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=28467"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=28467"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}