Defense counsel can\u2019t be ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress where nothing from the search was put into evidence at defendant\u2019s trial. There is no prejudice. Jordan v. United States, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102698 (E.D. Tenn. July 3, 2017).<\/p>\n
A Navy computer tech noticed that defendant\u2019s computer on the Navy\u2019s ONENET system had accessed child pornography. A command authorized search and seizure (CASS) was obtained. At defendant\u2019s off-base residence, his Filipino national fiancee also consented to the search after efforts were made to comply with the Status of Forces Agreement for Japan. The CASS was with probable cause and in good faith. United States v. Lancina, 2017 CCA LEXIS 436 (N.-M. Ct. Crim. App. June 30, 2017).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defense counsel can\u2019t be ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress where nothing from the search was put into evidence at defendant\u2019s trial. There is no prejudice. Jordan v. United States, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102698 (E.D. Tenn. July … Continue reading