{"id":26816,"date":"2017-04-16T09:56:58","date_gmt":"2017-04-16T14:56:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=26816"},"modified":"2017-04-16T09:56:58","modified_gmt":"2017-04-16T14:56:58","slug":"ga-statute-on-return-of-property-must-be-followed-cant-apply-to-court-first","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=26816","title":{"rendered":"GA: Statute on return of property must be followed; can&#8217;t apply to court first"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In a juvenile proceeding, recovery of the juvenile\u2019s cell phone required following a statutory procedure which wasn\u2019t. One can&#8217;t just apply to the court first. The further claim that retention of the phone violated the Fourth Amendment wasn\u2019t raised below and couldn\u2019t be on appeal. <a href=\"https:\/\/efast.gaappeals.us\/download?filingId=4ed690c0-098e-4665-9e20-a8eee42e9722\">In Interest of T.F.N.<\/a>, 2017 Ga. App. LEXIS 175 (April 14, 2017).<\/p>\n<p>Police went to defendant\u2019s seeking to talk to him for a showup based on information from the neighborhood through a woman who knew all about what went on there. Yes, it was just a street rumor. When they got to the apartment, however, the person answering the door lied about defendant being there, which only heightened the officers\u2019 suspicion to reasonable suspicion. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dccourts.gov\/internet\/documents\/14-CF-534.pdf\">Jackson v. United States<\/a>, 2017 D.C. App. LEXIS 81 (April 13, 2017).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In a juvenile proceeding, recovery of the juvenile\u2019s cell phone required following a statutory procedure which wasn\u2019t. One can&#8217;t just apply to the court first. The further claim that retention of the phone violated the Fourth Amendment wasn\u2019t raised below &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=26816\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[35,67],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-26816","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reasonable-suspicion","category-rule-41g-return-of-property"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26816","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=26816"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26816\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":26817,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26816\/revisions\/26817"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=26816"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=26816"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=26816"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}