Defendants had standing in packages shipped to them under assumed names. As to the affidavit: \u201cIn terms of any omissions, neither the omission of the statistics on the “profile,” nor the omission of information on the dogs’ reliability, warrants the conclusion that the good-faith exception should not apply. This follows because there would still be probable cause even if the information were included.\u201d \u201cThe same is true for any omitted information regarding the drug-detecting dogs’ reliability. The affidavits both note that the dogs, Boris and Spike, were trained to alert to the presence of drugs and have been certified within a year of the search.\u201d United States v. Bogen, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16716 (E.D. La. Feb. 7, 2017).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Defendants had standing in packages shipped to them under assumed names. As to the affidavit: \u201cIn terms of any omissions, neither the omission of the statistics on the “profile,” nor the omission of information on the dogs’ reliability, warrants the … Continue reading