{"id":25567,"date":"2017-01-31T21:34:00","date_gmt":"2017-02-01T02:34:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=25567"},"modified":"2017-01-31T21:34:00","modified_gmt":"2017-02-01T02:34:00","slug":"reason-trump-nominates-neil-gorsuch-to-the-supreme-court-fourth-amendment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=25567","title":{"rendered":"Reason: Trump Nominates Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court; Fourth Amendment?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Reason: T<a href=\"http:\/\/reason.com\/blog\/2017\/01\/31\/trump-nominates-neil-gorsuch-to-the-supr\">rump Nominates Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court<\/a> by Damon Root:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Gorsuch has also rejected pro-government deference in the Fourth Amendment context. For instance, in his 2016 dissent in <a href=\"https:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?q=United+States+v.+Carloss&#038;hl=en&#038;as_sdt=6,33&#038;case=4429129744961041669&#038;scilh=0\">United States v. Carloss<\/a>, Gorsuch strongly objected to the majority&#8217;s view that police officers had the &#8220;implied consent&#8221; to enter private property for a warrantless &#8220;knock and talk&#8221; on a homeowner&#8217;s front porch even though the homeowner had placed multiple &#8220;No Trespassing&#8221; signs around the property and even on the front door. Under the government&#8217;s flawed theory of the Fourth Amendment, Gorsuch complained, &#8220;a homeowner may post as many No Trespassing signs as she wishes. She might add a wall or a medieval-style moat, too. Maybe razor wire and battlements and mantraps besides. Even that isn&#8217;t enough to revoke the state&#8217;s right to enter.&#8221; As Gorsuch dryly observed, &#8220;this line of reasoning seems to me difficult to reconcile with the Constitution of the founders&#8217; design.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Reason: Trump Nominates Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court by Damon Root: Gorsuch has also rejected pro-government deference in the Fourth Amendment context. For instance, in his 2016 dissent in United States v. Carloss, Gorsuch strongly objected to the majority&#8217;s &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=25567\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[83],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25567","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-scotus"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25567","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=25567"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25567\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25568,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25567\/revisions\/25568"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=25567"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=25567"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=25567"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}