Warrant for search of the home was not limited, and search of a dictionary safe was permissible because the objects being sought could have been secreted there. United States v. Santiago, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77960 (E.D. Pa. October 3, 2008).* Also, “[t]he failure to anticipate the presence of other contraband … is not a legal defect and does not render the search unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment.” Sostre v. County of Suffolk, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77849 (E.D. N.Y. September 11, 2008).*<\/p>\n
That driver may have been nervous because he was being tailgated by a police officer was not a defense to moving out of the lane and he was validly subjected to a stop. United States v. Bravo-Ortega, 621 F. Supp. 2d 1159 (D. Utah 2008).* See also United States v. Rocha, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77973 (D. Kan. October 2, 2008) (weaving justified stop of defendant’s vehicle, even though he might have been swerving because he was followed.)<\/p>\n
Reasonable suspicion is all that is required for a stop, and the officer had it. Hill v. Crete, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78265 (N.D. Ill. October 6, 2008).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading