Rodriguez is not merely a durational test. Here, reasonable suspicion developed during the stop that justified the detention, something absent in Rodriguez. The video of the defendant\u2019s stop doesn\u2019t support his position, and it doesn\u2019t undermine the government\u2019s. It does lend support to the officer\u2019s testimony which the court finds credible. United States v. Ramos, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180659 (M.D.Ala. Nov. 16, 2016), adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45 (M.D.Ala. Jan. 3, 2017).<\/p>\n
Officers acted reasonably in seizing an apartment to obtain a search warrant under Segura. The occupants were suspected of sex trafficking inside. The probable cause was a statement from one of the victims. United States v. Szczerba, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180627 (E.D.Mo. Dec. 30, 2016).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Rodriguez is not merely a durational test. Here, reasonable suspicion developed during the stop that justified the detention, something absent in Rodriguez. The video of the defendant\u2019s stop doesn\u2019t support his position, and it doesn\u2019t undermine the government\u2019s. It does … Continue reading