{"id":2486,"date":"2008-09-25T08:16:30","date_gmt":"2008-09-25T08:16:30","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2008-09-25T08:16:30","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=2486","title":{"rendered":"Consent to enter on a knock and talk is not consent to search"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A consent to enter during a knock and talk is not a consent to search. United States v. Ellis, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71177 (W.D. La. June 24, 2008).<\/p>\n<p>DNA sample was taken from defendant under a ruse that anybody arrested for exposing himself in public needed to give a sample. It was matched to a murder. The taking of the DNA was not unreasonable. Holmes v. State, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 741 (September 22, 2008).<\/p>\n<p>A consent to search by a Spanish speaking defendant was not voluntary on the totality. The officer&#8217;s own testimony was the key. United States v. Vidal-Pina, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71644 (D.N.J. September 22, 2008):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The government&#8217;s theory is that Vidal-Pina was calculating and deceptive and that his answers about his work demonstrate proficiency in English that corroborates the officers&#8217; testimony that he understood the contents of the consent-to-search form and the verbal request to search the truck. But this simply doesn&#8217;t square with Maroney&#8217;s testimony that he was prepared to let Vidal-Pina go; it doesn&#8217;t square with the testimony that reveals, when taken as a whole, that Vidal-Pina initially communicated with a store employee and apparently got the gist of the pedigree information Maroney wanted, had enough business dealings in this country to describe what he does for a living, and never went any further in his communications without assistance. The inconsistencies to be found do not relate to Vidal-Pina&#8217;s conduct, but rather to the witnesses, who are at some odds about how much Spanish Turbett knew, or what precise answers Vidal-Pina gave to potentially explosive questions like &#8220;[w]hat were those counterfeit bills doing in your car?&#8221;; or why someone who knew he had identification documents in his car that could clear up Maroney&#8217;s dilemma knowingly remained silent about them, and then knowingly permitted police to search the truck for anything they could find in it, including contraband that he knew was there.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=2486\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2486","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2486","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2486"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2486\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2486"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2486"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2486"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}