{"id":2326,"date":"2008-12-24T09:04:31","date_gmt":"2008-08-03T06:23:28","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2008-08-05T06:36:35","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=2326","title":{"rendered":"MS:  Fire scene search is exigency and plain view"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A fire scene search is exigent circumstances, and what is found in plain view may be seized. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mssc.state.ms.us\/Images\/Opinions\/CO49480.pdf\">King v. State<\/a>, 987 So. 2d 490 (Miss. App. 2008):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>P14. Since the firefighters in the present case were responding to an emergency situation, they did not require a warrant to enter King&#8217;s home. Furthermore, testimony by Johnson established that the movement of furniture and other debris was required to properly search for hot spots. If firefighters miss a hot spot, there is a danger that the house could reignite, creating yet another emergency. There is no evidence that the firefighters in this case went on a fishing expedition to satisfy their curiosity or otherwise did more than necessary to search for hot spots. &#8220;In searching solely to ascertain the cause [of a fire], firemen customarily must remove rubble or search other areas where the cause of fires is likely to be found. An object that comes into view during such a search may be preserved without a warrant.&#8221; <a href=\"http:\/\/caselaw.lp.findlaw.com\/scripts\/getcase.pl?court=us&amp;vol=464&amp;invol=287\"><em>Michigan v. Clifford<\/em><\/a>, 464 U.S. 287, 295 n.6, 104 S. Ct. 641, 78 L. Ed. 2d 477 (1984).<\/p>\n<p>P15. King claims that &#8220;the criminal activity that firefighters were looking for was evidence of the possession of illegal drugs&#8221; and that &#8220;Johnson&#8217;s own testimony indicated that he was indeed looking for evidence of other criminal activity (drugs) not related to the fire &#8230;.&#8221; However, Johnson testified that firefighters are trained &#8220;to recognize certain objects that may be used for illegal activities for our safety and anybody elses [sic] safety that enters that structure.&#8221; Nowhere in Johnson&#8217;s testimony did he indicate that he entered King&#8217;s home to look for evidence of drugs. It is logical that firefighters would seize any drugs or other objects that might be a danger to the public. Furthermore, it is clear that if an object&#8217;s criminal nature is readily apparent, it may be seized in such situations if the object is in plain view. <em>Anderson v. State<\/em>, 864 So. 2d 948, 950 (P8) (Miss. Ct. App. 2003); <em>United States v. Green<\/em>, 474 F.2d 1385, 1389 (5th Cir. 1973); <em>United States v. Loos<\/em>, 165 F.3d 504, 506 (7th Cir. 1998); <em>United States v. Finnigin<\/em>, 113 F.3d 1182, 1186 (10th Cir. 1997). Quite simply, any criminal items that Johnson found in plain view were admissible without a warrant.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Tennessee city court judges can issue search warrants. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tsc.state.tn.us\/OPINIONS\/tcca\/PDF\/082\/FordDavidOPN.pdf\">State v. Ford<\/a>, 2008 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 565 (May 7, 2008).*<\/p>\n<p>Under Texas&#8217; bizarre statutes permitting JPs to issue search warrants when there is no lawyer in rural counties, this warrant for blood in a DUI was valid. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.1stcoa.courts.state.tx.us\/opinions\/HTMLopinion.asp?OpinionID=85716\">Muniz v. State<\/a>, 264 S.W.3d 392 (Tex. App.\u2014Houston (1st Dist.) 2008).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=2326\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2326","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2326","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2326"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2326\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2326"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2326"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2326"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}